Вы можете внести свой вклад в бесплатную работу FlightAware, разрешив показ рекламы на FlightAware.com. Мы следим за тем, чтобы наша реклама была полезна и не мешала работе с сайтом. Вы можете быстро
включить рекламу на FlightAware или приобрести
привилегированное членство.
I never read an exaggeration. I read about smoke, burnt up battery cells, and forced landings because of the batteries. I read about the fire on UPS because of those cells and saw the damage to craft N748UP in Philadelphia during 2006. In 1999 at an NWA cargo facility. The tragic UPS fire in Saudi Arabia in 2010. All of of which the NTSB investigated.
Those are facts, not fabrications or media hype.
Anyone who has ever done business at the Post Office has seen posters stating they do not accept Lithium type batteries for carriage.
Some people take the general public for fools and idiots (most of which are in the TV advertising business).
Yet, a "fix" was found without knowing the root cause? It's like taking your car to the dealer for cabin smoke, and being told it was "fixed' even tho they have no idea what caused it. If that strikes confidence in you, good.
But in a composite aircraft, that cannot withstand potential 1000° fires, I have a hard time feeling comfortable. Not when I see what happened to two other metal crafts. And if you consider that fear-mongering or media hype, the perhaps you are stuck in a paradigm that is a tad bit unrealistic.